|
Collusion Discovered between BSA and European
Commission
Who is the EC is really working for ?
EuroLinux
Alliance
petition.EuroLinux.org
For immediate Release
Paris, Munich, Amsterdam - 2002-02-19 -
The European Commission is likely to approve this wednesday a proposal of
directive on software patents. EuroLinux has managed to obtain a draft
version of the proposed directive. The same document was sent to a few
official representatives in European national governments.
Incidentally, the author of this document, according to the Microsoft Word
file, is Francisco Mingorance (franciscom@bsa.org), patent expert and director of public policy at
BSA (Business Software Alliance), an association which represents the
interests of large US software publishers in Europe.
Software patents are a major legal issue in the information society.
Copyright is currently the right way to protect software publishers against
piracy. "Copyright provides a simple and very efficient protection to the
software economy" says Matthias Schlegel, CEO of Phaidros. "Copyright is the
prefered protection of SMEs and independent software developers [1].
EuroLinux strongly supports copyright." adds Harmut Pilch, speaking for the
EuroLinux Alliance.
On the other hand, software patents allow one company to monopolize an idea
of software (ex. patent EP0800142 on the conversion of file names between DOS
and Windows) or an idea of business on the Internet (ex. EP0756731 on
generating buying incentives from the distribution of cooking recipes), thus
prohibiting other companies to use the same idea, even when implemented
differently. Because software is always based on a creative arrangement of a
few innovative ideas and many common ideas, all European software publishers
are infringing on hundred patents among the 50.000 software patents owned by
IBM, Microsoft, Sun or Sony, etc. "Thus, instead of protecting software
publishers, software patents create a tremendous juridical uncertainty and
allow large IT companies to completely control the software economy, block
innovation and block competition by prohibiting one software to be compatible
with another" says Stéfane Fermigier, CEO of Nuxeo. "Software patents
allow large IT companies to steal the intellectual property of smaller
players, both by taking control of their copyrighted creations and by forcing
them to disclose and trade their most competitive ideas in return for being
allowed to live." adds Jean-Paul Smets, CEO of Nexedi.
The content of the proposed directive draft legalises the illegal practice
[5] of the European Patent Office of granting patents on software and on
business methods [2]. The proposed directive draft requires inventions to be
"technical" but fails to define what is technical, thus creating an undefined
limit to patentability in Europe. The proposed directive draft does not
contain any provisions to prohibit patents on Internet standards, to garantee
interoperability and fair competition, to protect SMEs against juridical
terrorism or to to ensure that shareware and open source / free software are
not put at a disadvantage. It paves the way to a global control of the
information society by multinational - mostly US - IT corporations.
Patents are supposed to promote innovation. However, all economic studies
show that the introduction of patents in the software economy stiffles
innovation. [3,4,6,7,8]
Patents are supposed to protect independent innovators. However, all official
studies show that most if not all european software creators will just face
more juridical risk without better protection.
According to the Rome Treaty, EC directives are supposed to raise the level
of protection for consumers and to promote the development of technologies.
However, this directive discourages competition and innovation, and by
allowing large corporations to tax - through the use of IT - all economic
activities, this directive goes against the Rome Treaty. It is thus
constitutionaly illegal.
Eurolinux hopes that, by making public this draft document, the European
Commission will be encouraged to publish without delay the final version of
the proposed directive, at the same time as the expected press release and to
provide the same level of information to European Citizens as to the BSA.
Draft Directive
Please download the draft directive at http://petition.eurolinux.org/pr/proposal.doc
In order to understand the technical language of the directive and its juridical implications, EuroLinux
has prepared a commented version at http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/papri/eubsa-swpat0202/. Please
do not hesitate to call for more explanations on this technical material.
References
[1] Acceptable protection of software intellectual property: a survey of
software developers and lawyers. Effy Oz. Information & Management 34.
Elsevier 1998.
[2] European Software Patent Horror Gallery -
http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/pikta/mupli/index.en.html
[3] What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Samuel Kortum, Josh Lerner.
Research Policy 28. 1999. Elesevier
[4] Abstraction oriented property of software and its relation to
patentability. Tetsuo Tamai. Information and Software Technology. 1998.
Elsevier.
[5] Juridical Coup at the European Patent Office -
http://petition.eurolinux.org/pr/pr14.html
[6] Software Patentability with Compensatory Regulation: a Cost Evaluation.
Jean Paul Smets and Hartmut Pilch. Upgrade February 2002
http://swpat.ffii.org/stidi/pleji/
http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/issues/2001/6/up2-6Smets.pdf
[7] Fraunhofer Study about the Economic Effects of Software Patents. Micro
and Macroeconomic Implications of the Patentability of Software Innovations.
German Federal Ministry Economics and Technology. November 2001.
http://www.bmwi.de/Homepage/Politikfelder/Technologiepolitik/Technologiepolitik.jsp#softwarepatentstudie
http://www.bmwi.de/Homepage/download/technologie/Softwarepatentstudie_E.pdf
[8] Stimulating competition and innovation in the information society.
Conseil Général des Mines. September 2000. -
http://www.pro-innovation.org
The EuroLinux Alliance for a Free Information Infrastructure is an
open coalition of commercial companies and non-profit associations
united to promote and protect a vigourous European Software Culture
based on Open Standards, Open Competition, Linux and Open Source
Software. Companies, members or supporters of EuroLinux develop or
sell software under free, semi-free and non-free licenses for
operating systems such as Linux, MacOS or Windows.
The EuroLinux Alliance launched on 2000-06-15 an electronic
petition to protect software innovation in Europe. The EuroLinux
petition has received so far massive support from more than 100.000
European citizens, 2000 corporate managers and 300 companies.
Press Contacts
France & Europe: Jean-Paul Smets jp@smets.com
+33-6 62 05 76 14 Germany & Europe: Hartmut Pilch phm@ffii.org
+49-89 127 89 608 Denmark and Northern Europe: Anne Østergaard
aoe@sslug.dk Belgium: Nicolas
Pettiaux nicolas.pettiaux@linuxbe.org
Netherlands: Luuk van Dijk
Permanent URL for this PR
http://petition.EuroLinux.org/pr/pr17.html
Legalese
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other
trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective companies.
|